<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick Crawford &#187; Paper Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ngcrawford.com/category/paperclub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ngcrawford.com</link>
	<description>Evolution and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Targeted Sequencing Bags a Rare Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/11/17/targeted-sequencing-bags-a-rare-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/11/17/targeted-sequencing-bags-a-rare-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paper Club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngcrawford.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks neato. One of the first papers to use the Agilent Tech to do targeted re-sequencing.  I can't wait to get my hands on a PDF.
The impressive economy of this paper is that they targeted (using Agilent chips) less than 30Mb of the human genome, which is less than 1%. They also worked with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks neato. One of the first papers to use the Agilent Tech to do targeted re-sequencing.  I can't wait to get my hands on a PDF.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: normal; border-collapse: collapse;">The impressive economy of this paper is that they targeted (using Agilent chips) less than 30Mb of the human genome, which is less than 1%. They also worked with very few samples; only about 30 cases of Miller Syndrome have been reported in the literature. While I've <a style="color: #2244bb;" href="http://omicsomics.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-im-not-crazy-about-term-exome.html" target="_blank">expressed some reservations about "exome sequencing"</a>, this paper does illustrate why it can be very cost effective and my objections (perhaps not made clear enough before) is more a worry about being too restricted to "exomes" and less about targeting. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>More @ Omics! Omics!</p>
<p>via <a href="http://omicsomics.blogspot.com/2009/11/targeted-sequencing-bags-rare-disease.html">Targeted Sequencing Bags a Rare Disease</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/11/17/targeted-sequencing-bags-a-rare-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexually Antagonistic Selection, Sexual Dimorphism, and the Resolution of Intralocus Sexual Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/01/18/exually-antagonistic-selection-sexual-dimorphism-and-the-resolution-of-intralocus-sexual-conflict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/01/18/exually-antagonistic-selection-sexual-dimorphism-and-the-resolution-of-intralocus-sexual-conflict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paper Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual dimorphism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngcrawford.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven't read much on this particular topic, but given direction that my thesis is going I gotta start brushing up on the sexual selection literature.  Anyway, this unusual review discusses the importance of sexual selection from an intra-locus perspective the essential idea being that in sexually dimorphic species single locus traits may be under different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven't read much on this particular topic, but given direction that my thesis is going I gotta start brushing up on the sexual selection literature.  Anyway, this unusual review discusses the importance of sexual selection from an intra-locus perspective the essential idea being that in sexually dimorphic species single locus traits may be under different selective regimes depending upon the sex in which they are expressed (= sexually antagonistic selection).  The authors find, with some caveats, that sexually antagonistic selection may be present in as many as 17% of species that exhibit sexual dimorphism. </p>
<ul>
<li>Cox R, Calsbeek R. (2009) Sexually Antagonistic Selection, Sexual Dimorphism, and the Resolution of Intralocus Sexual Conflict. American Naturalist, vol. 173 [<a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/595841?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&amp;rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&amp;rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dncbi.nlm.nih.gov" target="_blank">link</a>]</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngcrawford.com/2009/01/18/exually-antagonistic-selection-sexual-dimorphism-and-the-resolution-of-intralocus-sexual-conflict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
